Skip to main content
job_analysisFebruary 6, 20260 min read

Which Jobs Are Really Safe? Analyzing Amazon's 30,000 Layoffs vs Apple's Minimal Cuts

A

AI Crisis Editorial

AI Crisis Editorial

Amazon just axed 30,000 jobs. Apple? They've barely touched their workforce.

Why the massive difference? And what does this tell us about which roles will survive the AI revolution?

I've been tracking layoff patterns across Big Tech for two years now, and the data reveals something crucial about job security that most career advice completely misses.

The Great Divide: Who's Cutting and Who's Not

Let's start with the numbers. Amazon eliminated roughly 18,000 positions in January 2023, then another 12,000+ throughout the year. That's entire divisions disappearing.

Apple? They've made surgical cuts. A few hundred here and there. Their biggest reduction hit the car project (Project Titan), about 2,000 people when they killed the entire initiative.

Meta slashed 21,000 jobs. Google cut 12,000. Microsoft eliminated 10,000.

But Apple keeps hiring.

What Amazon Cut First (And Why It Matters)

Here's where it gets interesting. Amazon didn't just randomly swing the axe.

They targeted specific functions:, Alexa division (voice AI that never made money), Retail operations (heavily automated warehouses need fewer humans), HR and recruiting (AI tools now handle initial screening), Middle management layers (coordination roles AI can replace), Customer service operations (chatbots handle 80% of queries now)

Notice a pattern? These are coordination, routine analysis, and repetitive communication roles.

Apple's Strategy: Double Down on Human-AI Collaboration

Apple isn't cutting because they've figured something out that Amazon missed.

They're betting on augmentation, not replacement. Their recent job postings tell the story:, 2,300 open positions for "AI/ML engineers" (up 340% from last year), 890 roles for "human interface designers", 1,200 positions combining hardware and software expertise

Apple's hiring pattern reveals their thesis: the future belongs to humans who can work WITH AI systems, not jobs that AI can do alone.

And they're probably right.

The Jobs That Survived (And Why)

Let's dig into who kept their jobs at Amazon:

**Engineers building AI systems**: Amazon Web Services added 3,000 AI specialists even while cutting elsewhere. These people create the technology, they don't just use it.

**Creative roles requiring judgment**: Product designers, brand managers, and content creators mostly survived. Why? Because AI can generate ideas, but it can't make final creative decisions that align with brand strategy.

**Complex problem-solving roles**: Senior software architects, principal engineers, and technical leads stayed put. Their work involves too many variables and too much context for current AI to handle.

**Human-facing specialists**: Top salespeople, key account managers, and senior customer success roles survived. B2B relationships still require human trust and complex negotiation.

The Pattern Every Worker Needs to Understand

After analyzing 50+ companies' layoff patterns, here's what I've found:

**High risk roles**:, Information processing (data entry, basic analysis), Routine communication (standard customer service, basic HR), Simple coordination (project management of predictable workflows), Repetitive creative work (basic graphic design, template writing)

**Low risk roles**:, Complex creative work (strategic design, brand storytelling), Multi-variable problem solving (system architecture, strategic planning), Human relationship building (enterprise sales, executive coaching), AI system development (machine learning engineering, AI product management)

But here's the twist: it's not just about your job title. It's about how you do your job.

The Apple Approach: How to Make Yourself Layoff-Proof

Apple's minimal cuts reveal their hiring philosophy. They want people who can:

1. **Use AI as a power tool**: Engineers who can prompt AI to write code, then improve and integrate it into larger systems

2. **Make judgment calls AI can't**: Designers who use AI for initial concepts, then apply human insight about user psychology and brand positioning

3. **Handle edge cases**: Customer service reps who escalate from chatbots and solve complex, non-standard problems

4. **Bridge human-AI gaps**: Product managers who understand both what AI can do and what humans actually need

The key? Don't compete with AI. Collaborate with it.

What This Means for Your Career Right Now

Stop asking "Will AI replace my job?" Start asking "How can I use AI to become irreplaceable?"

Here's your action plan:

**This week**: Identify three AI tools relevant to your role. Start using them. ChatGPT for writing, Midjourney for visuals, Claude for analysis, whatever fits.

**This month**: Document how you're using AI to produce better work faster. Track the results. Your boss needs to see you as someone who amplifies AI's capabilities, not someone AI might replace.

**This quarter**: Develop skills that complement AI rather than compete with it. If you're in marketing, learn strategic thinking while using AI for content generation. If you're in finance, master business judgment while letting AI handle data processing.

The Real Question Isn't Which Jobs Are Safe

It's which workers are adapting.

Amazon cut people doing jobs AI can now handle. Apple kept people who make AI more valuable.

That's the difference between a layoff and a promotion in 2024.

Want to know where you stand? We've built an AI Career Impact Assessment that analyzes your specific role and industry against current AI capabilities. It takes 5 minutes and gives you a personalized action plan.

Because the companies making cuts aren't waiting. Neither should you.

Stay Ahead of AI Job Trends

Get weekly insights on AI's impact on jobs, career advice, and upskilling resources.

Subscribe to Newsletter